Friday, February 17, 2023

PLASTIC - EPR (Extended Producer Responsibility)

 


Plastic is a miracle material. Thanks to plastics, countless lives have been saved in the health sector, and safe food storage has been revolutionized. But what makes plastic so convenient in our day-to-day lives - it's cheap - also makes it ubiquitous, resulting in one of our planet's greatest environmental challenges. 

Plastic packaging accounts for nearly half of all plastic waste globally, and much of it is thrown away within just a few minutes of its first use. Much plastic may be single-use, but that does not mean it is easily disposable. When discarded in landfills or in the environment, plastic can take up to a thousand years to decompose.

The good news is that a growing number of governments are taking action and demonstrating that all nations, whether rich or poor, can become global environmental leaders. Rwanda, a pioneer in banning single-use plastic bags, is now one of the cleanest nations on earth. Kenya has followed suit, helping clear its iconic national parks and save its cows from an unhealthy diet.

Learning from the experience of countries that have introduced bans and regulations on single-use plastics; India, Besides the national law, several states and cities have introduced bans on plastic carrier bags and other plastic materials. 

India, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (2016). Notification on Plastic Waste Management Rules, published in the Gazette of India, Part-II, Section-3, Sub-section (i), on March 18, 2016. Further, the amendment by Notification G.S.R. 571(E)-MOEF&CC Date: 12.08.2021, Notfn G.S.R. 647(E)-MOEF&CC Date: 17.09.2021, Notfn Notfn G.S.R. 133(E)-MOEF&CC Date: 16.02.2022, Notfn G.S.R. 522(E)-MOEF&CC Date: 06.07.2022. These rules shall apply to every waste generator, local body, Gram Panchayat, manufacturer, Importers, and producer.

In compliance with the above, CPCB has initiated the development of a comprehensive EPR portal comprising the following modules

i. EPR Registration for PIBOs

ii. Registration of PWPs

iii. Trading & Settlement of EPR obligations by PIBOs

iv. Filing of Annual Returns by stakeholders

v. Levying of Environmental Compensation

vi. Third-Party Audits

vii. Training / Capacity Building of stakeholders

List of Documents

The following documents are required for Plastics EPR Registration to CPCB.

Part A: General Information

1. MSME Certificate

2. Pan card & Aadhar Card of Authorised signatory

3. Photo of Plastics with details of the type of plastics

4. Pan Card Certificate of Company

5. GST Certificate of Company

6. Certification of Incorporation of Company

7. IEC Certificate of Company

8. Details of suppliers & Buyer as Vendors of product

Part B: pertaining to Liquid Effluent and Gaseous Emissions - Not Applicable for Importer

Part C: Pertaining to Waste - Details for F.Y. 2020-21 & F.Y. 2021-22

1. State-wise Category wise Quantity of (Pre + Post Consumer) PW Generated (TPA)

2. Filling of Procurement Details

3. Filling of Plastics Material Sold Details

Part D: An action plan for implementation of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) for Plastic Waste Management (PWM)

1. Covering letter

2. Scanned copy of the signature

3. Any other Information






Tuesday, December 29, 2020

Special measures to facilitate MSME for AEO Accreditation

 1. Please refer to the CBEC Circular No. 33/2016 dated 22.07.2016 as amended, hereinafter referred to as the "Master Circular" regarding the Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) programme. Para 3.1.9 of the Master Circular states that "In particular, the AEO Programme Manager shall take into account the possible difficulties for MSMEs in meeting with these eligibilities conditions and criteria under paras 3.3 and 3.5 to make the above AEO certificates more available to MSMEs."

 

2. In line with the Prime Minister's Aatma Nirbhar Bharat Abhiyaan to support MSMEs against the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, CBIC has examined the difficulties faced by MSMEs while applying for AEO accreditation. Accordingly, the Board has decided to relax the entire gamut of compliance and security requirements for MSMEs. The relaxation has been carried out to ensure that the MSMEs are facilitated through rationalized compliance requirements (MSME Annexure 1 & 2) and minimum but effective security requirements (MSME Annexure 3).

 

3. Accordingly, the Board has decided to facilitate MSMEs by further relaxing the current accreditation process and reducing the compliance burden for their AEO accreditation. The procedural modifications/relaxations for AEO accreditation of MSMEs are as under:

 

i.   The eligibility requirement of handling a minimum of 25 documents during the last financial year has been relaxed to 10 documents, subject to handling at least 5 documents in each half-year period of the preceding financial year (Ref.: Para 3.1.7 of the Master Circular).

 

ii. The requirement for the applicant to have "business activities for at least three financial years preceding the date of application" has been relaxed to two financial years. (Ref.: Para 3.1.6 of the Master Circular).

 

iii. The qualifying period for legal and financial compliance has been reduced from 'the last three financial years' to 'the last two financial years'. (Ref.: Paras 3.2 & 3.4 of the Master Circular).

 

iv. For AEO Tl and T2 accreditation, the present annexures i.e., Annexure A, B, C, D, E.I-E.4 have been supplanted with two annexures viz. MSME Annexure I and 2. Similar rationalized annexures 1 and 2 are presently being utilized for AEO Tl accreditation only in accordance with the CB1C Circular No. 26/2018-Customs dated 10.08.2018.

 

v. For AEO T2 certification, the present annexures i.e., Annexure E.5.1-E.5.7 for physical verification have been rationalized to a single annexure viz. MSME Annexure 3. The rationalization has been carried out to ensure that the security requirements for an MSME are objective and cover the minimum verifiable security criteria. (Ref.: Para 3.5 of the Master Circular).

 

vi. The time limit for processing of MSME AEO Tl & AEO T2 application has been reduced to fifteen working days (presently one month) and three months (presently six months) respectively after the submission of complete documents for priority processing by customs zones.

 

vii. The benefit of relaxation in the furnishing of Bank Guarantee for AEOs has been further relaxed to 25% from 50% and 10% from 25% of that required to be furnished by an importer/exporter who is not an AEO certificate holder, for MSME AEO Tl and MSME AEO T2 entities respectively (Ref.: Para 3.5 of the Master Circular).

 

4. The aforestated relaxations shall apply only to an applicant who has a valid MSME certificate from the line-Ministry. Further, the approved MSME must ensure their continuous MSME status during the validity of its AEO certification, if granted.

 Source: Cir. 54/2020-Cus Dt: 15.12.2020

Sunday, August 30, 2020

Guidelines on Implementation CAROTAR, 2020

Source: Circular No. 38/2020-CustomsDated 21.08.2020

1.   Reference is drawn to Chapter VAA and section 28DA of the Customs Act, 1962, which has been inserted vide clause 110 of Finance Act, 2020, and to Customs (Administration of Rules of Origin under Trade Agreements) Rules, 2020 (hereafter referred to as the CAROTAR, 2020) issued vide Notification No. 81/2020-Customs (N.T.) dated 21st August, 2020.

 

1.1 The aforementioned section and rules aim to supplement the operational certification procedures related to implementation of the Rules of Origin, as prescribed under the respective trade agreements (FTA/PTA/CECA/CEPA) and notified under the customs notifications issued in terms of section 5 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 for each agreement.

 

1.2 The CAROTAR 2020 shall come into force on 21st September, 2020, to provide sufficient time for transition and to ensure that the prescribed conditions in terms of rule 4 are compiled with. Necessary modifications in bill of entry format are being made to allow declaration in terms of rule 3(a) and 3(d) of CAROTAR, 2020.

 

1.3   This circular aims to provide procedure for sending verification request to the Verification Authorities in exporting countries in terms of trade agreements, section 28DA and CAROTAR, 2020, and further guidelines for implementation of aforementioned section and rules.

 

2.   The CAROTAR, 2020 and Rules of Origin notified for a trade agreement in terms of sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, broadly provide the following grounds for verification:

 

a)      In case of a doubt regarding the genuineness of the Certificate of Origin (CoO) such as any deficiency in the format of the certificate or mismatch of signatures or seal when compared with specimens on record.

 

b)     In case of a doubt on the accuracy of information regarding origin, i.e. where a doubt arises on whether the product qualifies as an originating good under the relevant Rules of Origin. In other words, these are cases where there is a reasonable belief that a product is not grown or not produced/manufactured in a particular country or required value addition/change in CTH/PSR etc., as the case may be, has not been achieved for the goods to qualify as originating.

 

c)      Verification could also be undertaken on random basis as a measure of due diligence. For this purpose, factors such as the quantum of duty being foregone, the nature of goods vis-a-vis the country of origin, commodities that are prone to mis-declaration of country of origin, compliance record of the importer etc., may be given regard while selecting Certificates of Origin for random verification.

 

3.   The Rules of Origin, by virtue of which a good attains origin of a country, have evolved with subsequent reviews of trade agreements. Most trade agreements have moved from single general rule to specific rule for most of the tariff lines, with inclusion of vast array of processes which can confer origin. Section 28DA makes it incumbent upon an importer to possess sufficient information as regards the manner in which country of origin criteria, including the regional value content and product specific criteria, specified in the Rules of Origin in the trade agreement, are satisfied. For this purpose, CAROTAR, 2020 has provided a form, containing list of basic minimum information which an importer is required to obtain while importing goods under claim of preferential rate of duty. Therefore, in case there is a doubt with regard to origin of goods, information should be first called upon from the importer of the goods, in terms of rule 5 read with rule 4 of CAROTAR, 2020, before initiating verification with the partner country in terms of rule 6.

 

3.1  Section28DA of the Act further states that mere submission of a certificate of origin shall not absolve the importer of the responsibility to exercise reasonable care to the accuracy and truthfulness of the information supplied. In case an importer fails to provide information in terms of section 28DA(1) (iii) of the Act and as prescribed under CAROTAR, 2020, or does not exercise reasonable care to ensure the accuracy and truthfulness of the information furnished, this fact should be informed to Risk Management Centre of Customs (RMCC) through written communication for the purposes of enabling compulsory verification of assessment of all subsequent import consignments in terms of rule 8(1) of CAROTAR, 2020. However, the compulsory verification of assessment should be discontinued once the importer demonstrates that he has established adequate system of controls to exercise reasonable care as required under the Act.

 

4.   Verification request should be forwarded to the Board based upon following standard operating procedures:

 

                  i.     In case several certificates pertaining to identical item are under review or scrutiny, only representative certificates should be forwarded to the Board to cause verification along with list of all CoOs to which the field formation aims to apply the result of such verification. Representative CoOs may be selected in such a manner to ensure that they cover each of the exporters, importers and the prescribed originating criteria. For instance, if there are several CoOs issued to a single exporter, but originating criteria are different, then CoOs covering each of the originating criteria may be considered to be forwarded for verification, with specific queries.

 

                  ii.     The verification proposal should be complete, keeping in mind all components of the prescribed format of CoO and all relevant aspects of the Rules of Origin, in order to avoid multiple queries to the Verification Authority/exporting country. For instance, in case a CoO has been issued retrospectively, it needs to be seen whether there are provisions in the Rules of Origin to issue retroactive CoO and whether reasons for retroactive issuance need to be provided by the Verification Authority. Similarly, should the proper officer feel the need to verify documents to establish compliance of 'direct consignment' or third-party invoicing, if provided for in the Rules of Origin, then the same should be included in the verification proposal.

 

           iii.     Requests for verification must be sent to the Board with the approval of the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner/Commissioner. The reference for verification must contain legible copies of the Certificate of Origin, invoice and the Bill of Lading/Airway Bill. The request should also contain the information listed in the Annex.

 

                iv.     Where verification is being considered for goods not cleared or cleared provisionally on grounds of verification of origin, such requests should be communicated immediately to the Board in case requests are in terms of rule 6(1)(a) or 6(1)(c) of CROTAR 2020; and within 10 days from the date of receipt of requisite information and documents from the importer in case the request is being considered in terms of rule 6(1)(b).

 

                  v.     Mechanism should be devised to monitor the requests which have been forwarded for verification, with special focus on cases where the timeline for response from the Verification Authorities is about to expire.

 

5.  For ascertaining correctness of a claim of preferential rate of duty under a trade agreement, information may be sought from the importer during the course of customs clearance or thereafter (e.g. during subsequent investigations or post-clearance audit). Likewise, a verification request may be made to an exporting country during the course of customs clearance of imported goods or thereafter. While the Act provides that information may be sought within a period of five years from the date of claim of preferential rate of duty by the importer, this time limit is subject to any other time limit as may be specified for this purpose under the trade agreement.

 

6.      The Rules of Origin under various trade agreements lay down the format of the certificate of origin, the period of validity, manner of obtaining the certificate and the procedure for verification of origin. One of the usual conditions for accepting the certificate is that it should be signed by the authorized signatories whose name, signature and seal have been communicated by the partner country through agreed channels. At present, the signatures and seals are received by the Board, either directly from the government of the partner country or through the Department of Commerce.

 

6.1 The Directorate General of Systems has built an online repository on ICES for storing the signatures/seals to facilitate comparison by the assessing officers. DRI has been tasked with uploading the data in the database.

 

6.2 For the benefit of non-EDI customs locations, copies of specimen signatures and seals will be circulated by DRI. For other locations, the ICES online repository may be utilized.

 

6.3 In case the specimen seal/signature is not available in the ICES online repository, the issue may be referred to the Board for verification.

 

7.      In terms of rule 6(5) of CAROTAR, 2020, Board has designated Director (ICD), CBIC as the nodal point for taking up verification of origin with partner countries. Hence all requests for verification should be addressed to:

 

Director (International Customs Division),

Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs,

Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Room No. 49, North Block, New Delhi -110001.

011- 2309 3380 (off); 011-2309 3760 (fax.) Email: ftaroo-cbic@gov.in

 

7.1 To help reduce time taken in communication of requests for verification of preferential country of Origin, it is advised to email all verification related correspondence to Board on ftaroo-cbic@gov.in. It may be noted that request through nic/icegate email ids will only be accepted. Such emails should include signed copy of the office letter and legible scanned copies of all relevant documents.

 

7.2 Where the information requested in terms of rule 6 is received, the proper officer should within the prescribed timelines either restore preferential claim or issue notice for denying the claim in terms of section 28DA, read with section 28 of the Act where required, in order to conclude the verification.

 

7.3 Where a claim for preferential rate of duty is denied, the CoO should be forwarded to the nodal point in the Board for record and onward communication to the exporting country, where required.

 

8.     It is requested to conduct frequent training sessions in the zones to familiarize the officers with provisions of Rules of Origin prescribed under various trade agreements. Verification may also be sought based on data analysis, keeping in mind any change in import trend of a commodity, exporter, importer or any amendments to duty rates. Attention may also be drawn to the fact that where originating criteria claimed is as per product specific rules (PSRs), the HSN (harmonised system of nomenclature) version prescribed in the trade agreement shall apply. The preferential tariff treatment should be extended only in terms of the extant notification. For instance, provision for issuance of Back-to-Back CoO is presently available only under ASEAN-India FTA, and hence Back-to-Back CoO should not be accepted for goods imported under any other trade agreement.

 

8.1 It is also requested to share policy related feedback with the Board, through International Customs Division, to help analyse provisions of trade agreements which may require policy review.

 

9.    Instruction no. 31/2016 - Customs dated 12.09.2016 stands superseded with the issue of this Circular.

 

10. Suitable Standing Order may be issued. Difficulties faced, if any, in implementation of this circular, may be immediately brought to the notice of the Board.

 

Annex 

[Please refer Paragraph 4(iii) of this Circular]

1.

Name of the Commissionerate

 

2.

Name of the Free/ Preferential Trade Agreement

 

3.

Relevant Customs Notifications

(Both Tariff and Non-Tariff notifications)

 

4.

Reference No. of the Certificate of Origin

 

5.

Issuing Authority

 

6.

Name of the Consignee

 

7.

Name of the Consignor

 

8.

Description of goods

 

9.

Origin criteria as mentioned in the certificate

 

10.

Revenue involved (forgone)

 

11.

Reason for requesting verification along with supporting documents, if any: Please enclose

 

 

 

 

 

Please enclose:

1. A legible copy of the Certificate of Origin, invoice and Bill of Lading/Airway Bill.

2. Questionnaire for the Verification Authority, where required, with specific queries.



Sec - 28 DA of Customs Act, 1962

 Procedure regarding the claim of Preferential Rate of Duty

(1) An importer making claim for a preferential rate of duty, in terms of any trade agreement, shall,––

(i)    make a declaration that goods qualify as originating goods for preferential rate of duty under such agreement;

 

(ii)  possess sufficient information as regards the manner in which country of origin criteria, including the regional value content and product specific criteria, specified in the rules of origin in the trade agreement, are satisfied;

 

(iii) furnish such information in such manner as may be provided by rules;

 

(iv) Exercise reasonable care as to the accuracy and truthfulness of the information furnished.

 

(2) The fact that the importer has submitted a certificate of origin issued by an Issuing Authority shall not absolve the importer of the responsibility to exercise reasonable care.

 

(3) Where the proper officer has reasons to believe that country of origin criteria has not been met, he may require the importer to furnish further information, consistent with the trade agreement, in such manner as may be provided by rules.

 

(4) Where importer fails to provide the requisite information for any reason, the proper officer may,––

(i)    cause further verification consistent with the trade agreement in such manner as may be provided by rules;

 

(ii)  pending verification, temporarily suspend the preferential tariff treatment to such goods:

 

Provided that on the basis of the information furnished by the importer or the information available with him or on the relinquishment of the claim for preferential rate of duty by the importer, the Principal Commissioner of Customs or the Commissioner of Customs may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, disallow the claim for a preferential rate of duty, without further verification.

 

(5)   Where the preferential rate of duty is suspended under sub-section 28 DA(4), the proper officer may, on the request of the importer, release the goods subject to furnishing by the importer a security amount equal to the difference between the duty provisionally assessed under section 18 and the preferential duty claimed:

 

Provided that the Principal Commissioner of Customs or the Commissioner of Customs may, instead of security, require the importer to deposit the differential duty amount in the ledger maintained under section 51A.

 

(6) Upon temporary suspension of preferential tariff treatment, the proper officer shall inform the Issuing Authority of reasons for the suspension of preferential tariff treatment, and seek specific information as may be necessary to determine the origin of goods within such time and in such manner as may be provided by rules.

 

(7) Where, subsequently, the Issuing Authority or exporter or producer, as the case may be, furnishes the specific information within the specified time, the proper officer may, on being satisfied with the information furnished, restore the preferential tariff treatment.

 

(8) Where the Issuing Authority or exporter or producer, as the case may be, does not furnish information within the specified a time or the information furnished by him is not found satisfactory, the proper officer shall disallow the preferential tariff treatment for reasons to be recorded in writing:

 

Provided that in case of receipt of incomplete or non-specific information, the proper officer may send another request to the Issuing Authority stating specifically the shortcoming in the information furnished by such authority, in such circumstances and in such manner as may be provided by rules.

 

(9) Unless otherwise specified in the trade agreement, any request for verification shall be sent within a period of five years from the date of claim of preferential rate of duty by an importer.

 

(10) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, the preferential tariff treatment may be refused without verification in the following circumstances, namely:––

 

(i)    the tariff item is not eligible for preferential tariff treatment;

 

(ii)  complete description of goods is not contained in the certificate of origin;

 

(iii) any alteration in the certificate of origin is not authenticated by the Issuing Authority;

 

(iv) the certificate of origin is produced after the period of its expiry,

 

        and in all such cases, the certificate of origin shall be marked as ‘‘INAPPLICABLE’’.

 

(11) Where the verification under this section establishes non-compliance of the imported goods with the country of origin criteria, the proper officer may reject the preferential tariff treatment to the imports of identical goods from the same producer or exporter, unless sufficient information is furnished to show that identical goods meet the country of origin criteria.

 

Explanation.––For the purposes of this Chapter,––

(a)   certificate of origin” means a certificate issued in accordance with a trade agreement certifying that the goods fulfill the country of origin criteria and other requirements specified in the said agreement;

 

(b)  identical goods” means goods that are same in all respects with reference to the country of origin criteria under the trade agreement;

 

(c)   Issuing Authority” means any authority designated for the purposes of issuing certificate of origin under a trade agreement;

(d) “Trade agreement” means an agreement for trade in goods between the Government of India and the Government of a foreign country or territory or economic union.

Featured Post

PLASTIC - EPR (Extended Producer Responsibility)

  Plastic is a miracle material. Thanks to plastics, countless lives have been saved in the health sector, and safe food storage has been re...